Rudy Quan vs Ryan Dickerson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Dickerson has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 44.62% compared to Quan's 42.26%. How much impact might this have on the outcome?
• Quan has been slightly more effective in returning their opponent's second serve, winning 49.49% of points compared to Dickerson's 48.87%.
• Both players show comparable performance when returning first serves, with Quan achieving 28.6% and Dickerson close behind at 28.51%.
• Under pressure situations, Dickerson marginally outperforms Quan by saving 52.5% of breakpoints versus Quan's 51.75%.
• Dickerson excels on clay with a career win rate of 62%, while Quan's best record is on hard surfaces, winning 60% of matches.
• Considering last year's match outcomes, Dickerson appears to have a slightly better overall winning percentage at 61.22% compared to Quan's 55%.
• In direct head-to-head encounters, they've each won one match and the sets are tied at 3-3, indicating how evenly matched they are.
• In matches extending to a deciding set, Dickerson shows a slight advantage with a 27% success rate over the past year, compared to Quan's 25%.
• Dickerson has faced tougher competition over the past year, playing against opponents with an average rank of 237.02, compared to Quan’s lower average opponent rank of 277.2.
• Dickerson leads in converting break points recently, with a success rate of 40.3% compared to Quan's 38.33%.
• Previous match duration and close set competitions suggest potential for a long match if they play to their recent form.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis clash between Quan and Dickerson promises to be an intriguing one, filled with potential twists and turns based on the players' recent performances. Quan shows a stronger return game against his opponent's second serve, which might be key to breaking Dickerson's flow.

However, Dickerson's slight statistical edge in saving breakpoints and higher rate of converting opportunities can become decisive, especially under high-pressure situations that often decide closely contested matches.

Dickerson’s experience against stronger opponents suggests he may handle challenging circumstances with more resilience, which aligns with his past performance in deciding sets. Furthermore, Dickerson's triumph in their last head-to-head on a hard surface gives him a psychological advantage.

Based on current trends and historical advantages, Dickerson seems more likely to emerge victorious in this anticipated matchup. Nonetheless, with both players closely matched in ability, surprises may be in store.